Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41016658›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2025

A computational perspective on rapid reacquisition: Phenotype-specific effects of reinforcement history.

John Michael Falligant, Shane H Phillips, Michael P Kranak, Bryan Klapes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John Michael FalligantDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, USA. Electronic address: jmf0031@auburn.edu.
Shane H PhillipsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, USA.
Michael P KranakOakland University, Department of Human Development and Child Studies, USA; Oakland University Center for Autism, USA.
Bryan KlapesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, USA.

Funding

A Single-Arm Pilot trial for Mitigating Relapse of Severe Problem BehaviorR21HD112724 · NICHD · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI FALLIGANT, JOHN · 2024 to 2025
$426k
Using Behavioral Economics to Mitigate Relapse of Problem Behavior in an Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities PopulationR21HD113794 · NICHD · OAKLAND UNIVERSITY · PI KRANAK, MICHAEL · 2024 to 2024
$426k
Optimizing Dimensions of Reinforcement to Enhance Behavioral InterventionsR21HD113881 · NICHD · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI FALLIGANT, JOHN · 2024 to 2025
$385k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD112724NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD113794NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD113881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid reacquisition refers to the recurrence of a previously eliminated behavior following the response-dependent reintroduction of the reinforcer that originally maintained it. Woods and Bouton (2007) demonstrated that rapid reacquisition was attenuated when behavior was decelerated using intermittent reinforcement rather than extinction-a finding attributed to the reduced discriminability of reinforcer reintroduction under intermittent schedules. The present study used artificial organisms (AOs) animated by the Evolutionary Theory of Behavior Dynamics (ETBD) to evaluate the extent to which rapid reacquisition and its mitigation can be captured within a computational framework. AOs with phenotypes characterized by a high sensitivity to environmental contingencies exhibited reduced reacquisition of the target response following intermittent reinforcement compared to extinction, replicating prior findings. In contrast, AOs with diminished sensitivity to environmental changes showed little difference in reacquisition across response elimination conditions; instead, their relapse was primarily driven by the density of reinforcement in the reacquisition challenge condition. These findings revealed that susceptibility to disruption varied systematically with mutation rate, offering a computational perspective on how reinforcement sensitivity modulates behavioral persistence. These findings suggest that the impact of reinforcement history on relapse is phenotype-dependent and potentially shaped by operant variability. This study is the first to demonstrate rapid reacquisition using the ETBD and provides a foundation for future theoretical and translational investigations of relapse and resistance to change.

Indexed as

Artificial CellsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalReinforcement ScheduleAlgorithmsAnimalsBiological EvolutionComputer SimulationMutationPhenotypeRatsRecurrenceBehavioral phenotypesComplexity theoryComputational modelingIntermittent reinforcementRelapse

Identifiers

PMID41016658
PMCPMC12964443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.