ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2025
Campus climate and intersectional inequities in eating disorders among U.S. college students: A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.
Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo advance understanding of how contextual factors explain eating disorder (ED) inequities among college students, we examined associations between campus climate - i.e., the extent to which a given school is hostile vs. friendly to students of diverse social/cultural backgrounds - and ED prevalence across intersections of gender, sexual, and racialized identity.
methodCross-sectional data came from 15,544 students at colleges/universities that participated in the 2018/2019 Healthy Minds Study. We conducted a Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) by grouping participants into 35 intersectional social strata defined by gender, sexual, and racialized identity and fitting multilevel models to obtain stratum-specific prevalence estimates of probable EDs across the range of campus climate ratings (1 = "very hostile" to 5 = "very friendly").
resultsCampus climate was inversely associated with probable EDs; specifically, for every 1-unit increase in ratings (i.e., more friendly climates), odds decreased by 8 %. There were differences in the magnitude of this association across strata, such that multiply marginalized students experienced the largest benefits from attending "very friendly" campuses, and especially those who were cisgender women and/or LGBQ+.
conclusionsResults reveal a complex social patterning of EDs among college students across campus climate ratings and provide preliminary evidence suggesting that hostile campus climates may function as a driver of intersectional inequities in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.