Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41016014›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A novel pairwise sequence alignment algorithm for similarity search in massive datasets.

Yosef Masoudi-Sobhanzadeh, Yadollah Omidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yosef Masoudi-SobhanzadehDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Rumeli University, Piri Paşa, Boduroğlu Sk. No. 22, 34445 Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2472-0980
Yadollah OmidiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in sequencing technologies have resulted in the production of a huge volume of data. Since the pairwise sequence alignment plays an essential role in comparing sequencing data, various algorithms have been developed. Among the previously suggested algorithms, the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) is currently employed in a wide range of biological applications, largely due to its low time and memory complexity. However, not only BLAST but also other improved sequence alignment algorithms may fail to produce accurate results, therefore, more efficient algorithms can be highly advantageous. In the present study, we introduce a novel algorithm for sequence alignment (NASA) consisting of preprocessing and aligning steps. In the preprocessing step, the positions of residues are determined within a provided nucleotide or peptide sequence, resulting in seeking only informative regions. In the aligning step, based on a constant number of comparisons, the sequence similarity score is calculated between two sequences in a linear time and memory orders. To evaluate NASA, a large volume of sequencing data was analyzed and the outcomes were compared with other algorithms. The results showed that NASA outperforms other basic algorithms in terms of the elapsed time, required memory, system resource utilization, and alignment score precision. Collectively, NASA might be a promising method for retrieving similar sequences from large datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSequence AlignmentComputational BiologySoftwarealignment algorithmsheuristic methodsmassive datasetspairwise sequence alignmenttime and memory complexities

Identifiers

PMID41016014
PMCPMC12476838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.