ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Global research landscape of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2025).
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Suggestions and insights from 28 bibliometric studies in the Journal of Robotic Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of preoperative ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block on pain thresholds and postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological laparoscopy: a randomised clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Visualizing the development of robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a comprehensive bibliometric study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The Revolution in Surgery That Saves Millions of Lives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic surgery has transformed gynecologic oncology by enhancing surgical precision and reducing complications, particularly for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers. This study employs bibliometric analysis to systematically evaluate the scientific trajectory, research trends, and international collaboration in robotic surgery for gynecologic malignancies over nearly two decades (2005-2025). Using the Web of Science database, a total of 561 publications were identified and analyzed with Citespace, VOSviewer, and R-bibliometrix. The United States emerged as the most productive nation, with the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Italy) as the leading institution. The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology published the highest volume of research, and Giovanni Scambia was the most prolific author. Key research themes included endometrial cancer, robotic surgery, laparoscopy, lymphadenectomy, radical hysterectomy, cervical cancer, recurrence, and survival outcomes. Future progress depends on multicenter randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), global partnerships, and AI integration to advance therapeutic potential and promote equitable global access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.