ReviewInflammopharmacology2025
Analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of carbenoxolone: a review.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy for depression: targeting cytokine pathways in major depressive disorder.Psychopharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbenoxolone (CBX) is a glycyrrhetinic acid derivative with potential anti-inflammatory and pain-relieving properties shown by clinical and preclinical studies. In animal studies, CBX reduced pain hypersensitivity by inhibiting gap junction communication, reducing neuroinflammation, and increasing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic signaling.We reviewed analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of CBX reported by preclinical (n = 15) and clinical (n = 8) studies following a systematic search in PubMed and Scopus, and discuss its safety profile and kinetic properties. The preclinical studies on rodents employed behavioral pain assessments such as paw withdrawal, head withdrawal, tail flick, licking behavior, and formalin-induced responses, and clinical studies used scoring to record pain severity. Preclinical data indicated the effectiveness of CBX in reducing mechanical, thermal, and chemical hypersensitivity. In clinical studies, topical CBX accelerated lesion healing in herpes-associated pain and oral CBX promoted recovery in peptic ulcers; nevertheless, its role in symptom relief was inconsistent and often secondary to tissue healing. CBX also demonstrated broad anti-inflammatory activities across various models, primarily through the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, suppression of NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling, and reduction of oxidative stress markers inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nitric oxide (NO). Noteworthy, side effects of CBX include sodium retention, weight gain, electrolyte imbalances, hypokalemia, mild edema, elevated blood pressure, headache, and heartburn. Given the strong preclinical evidence but limited clinical validation, further research is needed to clarify CBX analgesic/anti-inflammatory mechanisms/efficacy and fully elucidate its safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41015959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.