ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Implementation of point-of-care EEG in a pediatric emergency department: a quality improvement study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central nervous system disorders are among the most common reasons for pediatric emergency department (PED) visits. Status epilepticus (SE) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) are particularly concerning, and the latter requires electroencephalography (EEG) for diagnosis. However, standard EEG is resource intensive and rarely available outside regular working hours. Point-of-care EEG (pocEEG) is a novel tool for rapid neuromonitoring in the PED. We aimed to implement pocEEG as a quality improvement initiative in a tertiary pediatric hospital. A simplified two-channel EEG setup was gradually implemented in the PED. A convenience sample of patients was recruited to assess feasibility. The clinical data of 62 pocEEG recordings were retrospectively analyzed. Concordance was assessed with standard EEGs within 48 h. Abnormal findings were observed in 45% (28/62) of pocEEGs, more frequently in patients with known pre-existing conditions (18/28 vs. 10/28, p = .024). Seizure activity was recorded in 16% of cases (10/62), mostly in patients with pre-existing conditions (8/10). Concordance between pocEEG and standard EEG was assessed in 37/62 pocEEGs, of which 68% were concordant and 8% normalized before standard EEG. pocEEG influenced 60% of clinical decisions by aiding altered mental status (AMS) assessment, antiseizure medication guidance in active SE, and NCSE identification.
conclusionpocEEG is a feasible and effective tool for rapid neuromonitoring in the PED. It aids seizure detection, AMS evaluation, and treatment decisions. Further research is warranted to assess its impact on time to diagnosis, seizure duration, outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and standardized workflows for timely standard EEG follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Altered mental status (AMS) and seizures are frequent and high-acuity presentations in pediatric emergency critical care settings. • Nonconvulsive status epilepticus can only be diagnosed by EEG, yet immediate access to standard EEG is often unavailable. WHAT IS NEW: • This quality improvement study shows that simplified, point-of-care EEG (pocEEG) can be successfully implemented and is a valuable tool for rapid neuromonitoring. • The study demonstrates feasibility of pocEEG with enhanced seizure detection and AMS assessment with the potential to bridge critical diagnostic gaps where 24/7 standard EEG is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.