ReviewKorean journal of radiology2025
State-of-the-Art Imaging in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Treatment for Advanced Bladder Cancer.
Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates Reshape the Landscape of Cancer Therapy: Evolution, Challenges and Future Perspectives from the Concept of "Magic Bullet" to Clinical Application.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for advanced bladder cancer, particularly enfortumab vedotin and trastuzumab deruxtecan, which target Nectin-4 and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2), respectively. These ADCs have shown substantial efficacy, improving survival in patients who have progressed after chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Imaging plays a pivotal role in ADC-based therapy, extending beyond diagnosis and staging to assessing treatment response, detecting recurrence, and evaluating toxicity. Computed tomography (CT), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are widely used for these purposes. Despite the efficacy of ADCs, resistance mechanisms such as antigen loss and payload resistance continue to pose challenges, necessitating the development of next-generation ADCs. Response assessment largely relies on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, with growing interest in multiparametric MRI for evaluating complete response in bladder lesions. Additionally, imaging helps identify ADC-related toxicities, including pneumonitis and gastrointestinal complications. Radiologists must be aware of these evolving therapeutic and imaging paradigms to optimize patient management. The integration of imaging with ADC-based treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach to improve outcomes. This review highlights the critical role of imaging in ADC therapy and underscores the need for radiologists to adapt to these advancements in bladder cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.