ArticleJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2025
Effect of Jiegeng () on Jingjie () "" into the lungs based on pharmacokinetics.
Article in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Platycodon grandiflorus-Derived Nanovesicles Sensitize Gastric Cancer to T Cell Killing via Ferroptosis-Driven Membrane Mechanical Remodeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether Jiegeng (
methodsThe volatile oil and aqueous extract of ST were extracted by hydrodistillation. RP's aqueous extract underwent aqueous extraction. After individual and co-administration, we conducted pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies on Sprague-Dawley male rats.
resultsPeak concentration (Cmax), mean retention time from 0 to ∞ (MRT0→∞), and area under the curve (AUC0→10), (AUC0→∞) were 1.51, 1.14, 2.34, and 3.86 times higher in the co-administration group than in the individual administration group, respectively (
conclusionAfter co-administration, the retention of pulegone in the body was prolonged, the elimination of pulegone from the body was delayed, and the accumulation of pulegone in the lungs was facilitated. Therefore, using RP as a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.