ArticleJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2025
Various acupuncture therapies for managing nonspecific low back pain: a network Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects of nine acupuncture-related therapies (acupuncture, scrapping therapy, catgut embedding, blood-letting, electro-acupuncture, warm acupuncture, cupping, moxibustion, and needle knife) in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain (NLBP), providing evidence-based medical support for clinical treatment.
methodsRandomized controlled trials evaluating various acupuncture therapies for NLBP were screened from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool, and the data were analyzed using STATA 15.1.
resultsThis study included 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1356 participants and assessing pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), improvement in dysfunction using the oswestry disability index (ODI), and the effective rate. Blood-letting [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 81.4] exhibited a significant clinical effect in relieving NLBP in studies with the VAS score as the outcome indicator, followed by cupping (SUCRA = 70.4) and moxibustion (SUCRA = 58.5). Scrapping therapy (SUCRA = 77.7) had the most significant effect on improving NLBP-related functional impairment, followed by moxibustion (SUCRA = 59.8), and then bloodletting (SUCRA = 58.2). The effective rates of warm acupuncture (SUCRA = 78.0), scrapping therapy (SUCRA = 77.2) and blood-letting (SUCRA = 58.6) were better than those of acupuncture (SUCRA = 12.0), especially for cold and wet NLBP. These findings demonstrate the importance of syndrome differentiation during clinical decision making when determining diagnosis and treatment.
conclusionBlood-letting was the most effective treatment for relieving pain, and scrapping therapy was the most effective treatment for improving dysfunction. Warm acupuncture was the preferred treatment for cold and wet NLBP. However, further high-quality clinical studies are needed for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.