ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Gait-to-Contact (G2C): A Novel Deep Learning Framework to Predict Total Knee Replacement Wear from Gait Patterns.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Metallic Orthopedic Implant Development: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTotal knee replacement (TKR) is the most common inpatient surgery in the US. Studies leveraging finite element analysis (FEA) models have shown that variability of gait patterns can lead to significant variability of wear rates in TKR settings. However, FEA models can be resource-intensive and time-consuming to execute, hindering further research in this area. This study introduces a novel deep learning-based surrogate modeling approach aimed at significantly reducing computational costs and processing time compared to traditional FEA models.
methodsA published method was used to generate 314 variations of ISO14243-3 (2014) anterior/posterior translation, internal/external rotation, flexion/extension, and axial loading time series, and a validated FEA model was used to calculate linear wear distribution on the polyethylene liner. A deep learning model featuring a transformer-CNN based encoder-decoder architecture was trained to predict linear wear distribution using gait pattern time series as input. Model performance was evaluated by comparing the deep learning and FEA model predictions using metrics such as mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for relevant geometric features of the wear scar, structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and normalized mutual information (NMI).
resultsThe deep learning model significantly reduced the computational time for generating wear predictions compared to FEA, with the former training and inferring in minutes, and the latter requiring days. Comparisons of deep learning model wear map predictions to FEA results yielded MAPE values below 6% for most of the variables and SSIM and NMI values above 0.88, indicating a high level of agreement.
conclusionThe deep learning approach provides a promising alternative to FEA for predicting wear in TKR, with substantial reductions in computational time and comparable accuracy. Future research will aim to apply this methodology to clinical patient data, which could lead to more personalized and timely interventions in TKR settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41015655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.