ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2025
A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for the Prediction of Plasma and Bone Tissue Exposure after Prophylactic Administration of Ampicillin/Sulbactam in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe combination of ampicillin (AMP) together with sulbactam (SBC) is a widely used choice for infection prophylaxis in the context of numerous surgical procedures, especially those performed in the field of maxillofacial surgery. Since the pharmacokinetic behavior of these two substances in body tissues is not known in detail owing to sparse tissue data in the literature, the aim of this work was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that can predict the concentration versus time courses of AMP and SBC after intravenous administration in plasma, especially bone tissue. Furthermore, the effectiveness of an established prophylaxis regimen based on the developed PBPK model was to be evaluated.
methodsA PBPK model for middle-aged and elderly populations was created using PK-Sim
resultsThe final PBPK model for AMP and SBC could well describe the measured mean concentrations in plasma and in the different body tissues, as these fell within the predicted 5th-95th percentile range for the most part. This applies to 97% of the AMP and 88% of the SBC measurements. Exactly 81% of the fold error values of the pharmacokinetic parameters are within the twofold acceptance criterion. Overall, the average fold errors for the evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters were within the range of 1.01-1.43.
conclusionsIn this work, we present the first PBPK model that simultaneously predicts AMP and SBC in plasma and various tissues. In addition to observed plasma data, the model was also developed and verified with experimentally measured data from the above-mentioned tissues. This allowed a significant limitation of previous PBPK models to be overcome. The effectiveness of established prophylaxis regimes is demonstrated through our model, whereby it must be assumed, owing to measured data for bone tissue, that some individuals do not reach the target values for adequate prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.