ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Generation of multimodal realistic computational phantoms as a test-bed for validating deep learning-based cross-modality synthesis techniques.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phantom-based synthetic renal PCASL data generation for overcoming data scarcity and enhancing deep learning-based segmentation.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the reliability of markerless tumor tracking with single-energy and dual-energy imaging using machine learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The validation of multimodal deep learning models for medical image translation is limited by the lack of high-quality, paired datasets. We propose a novel framework that leverages computational phantoms to generate realistic CT and MRI images, enabling reliable ground-truth datasets for robust validation of artificial intelligence (AI) methods that generate synthetic CT (sCT) from MRI, specifically for radiotherapy applications. Two CycleGANs (cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks) were trained to transfer the imaging style of real patients onto CT and MRI phantoms, producing synthetic data with realistic textures and continuous intensity distributions. These data were evaluated through paired assessments with original phantoms, unpaired comparisons with patient scans, and dosimetric analysis using patient-specific radiotherapy treatment plans. Additional external validation was performed on public CT datasets to assess the generalizability to unseen data. The resulting, paired CT/MRI phantoms were used to validate a GAN-based model for sCT generation from abdominal MRI in particle therapy, available in the literature. Results showed strong anatomical consistency with original phantoms, high histogram correlation with patient images (HistCC = 0.998 ± 0.001 for MRI, HistCC = 0.97 ± 0.04 for CT), and dosimetric accuracy comparable to real data. The novelty of this work lies in using generated phantoms as validation data for deep learning-based cross-modality synthesis techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.