Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41015619›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2025

Pre-attentive Pitch Processing of Harmonic Complex Sounds at Sensor and Source Levels: Comparing Simultaneously Recorded EEG and MEG Data.

Talya C Inbar, Jean-Michel Badier, Christian Bénar, Khoubeib Kanzari, Mireille Besson, Valérie Chanoine

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Talya C InbarAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.
Jean-Michel BadierInstitute for Language and Communication in the Brain, Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-6455
Christian BénarInstitute for Language and Communication in the Brain, Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3339-1306
Khoubeib KanzariInst Neurosci Syst, Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Marseille, France.
Mireille BessonAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-5274
Valérie ChanoineInstitute for Language and Communication in the Brain, Aix-en-Provence, France. Valerie.Chanoine@univ-amu.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3492-8160

Funding

A*MIDEX, a French "Investissements d'Avenir" AMX-19-IET-002France 2030 ANR-16-CONV-0002France Life Imaging network ANR-11-INBS-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), two of the most widely used tools for studying human brain dynamics, are thought to have varying spatial resolutions. Here, we simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG data from 14 participants to directly compare their sensitivities - at both the sensor and source levels - to the auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN in EEG and MMNm in MEG) elicited by pitch deviants. At the sensor level, we observed that negative components emerged in early (100-190 ms) and late (260-420 ms) latency windows. These responses displayed a fronto-central distribution in EEG and a centro-parietal distribution in MEG. MEG also yielded larger effect sizes than EEG, likely reflecting differences in signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG. At the source level, our findings support the involvement of a fronto-temporal auditory MMN network. Both EEG and MEG identified generators in the superior temporal gyrus, Heschl's gyrus, interior frontal gyrus, and insular regions. Notably, EEG source localization revealed additional generators in the left superior temporal sulcus not detected by MEG, whereas MEG identified late components generators in the right hemisphere that were not observed with EEG. Taken together, these results suggest that EEG and MEG may provide complementary perspectives on auditory processing. However, given the inherent complexity of comparing data acquired with different methodologies and the limited sample size, our conclusions should be regarded as preliminary.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyMagnetoencephalographyPitch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEEGHarmonic complex sounds.MEEGMEGMismatch negativity (MMN)Pre-attentive auditory processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.