ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2025
Influence of lip protrusion and thickness on the perception of facial profile attractiveness among subjects with different ethnic backgrounds.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Related Variations in Lower Facial Soft-Tissue Thickness: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Correlation Between Lip Prominence and Orthodontic Incisor Repositioning Within an Aesthetic Triangle Framework.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of lip protrusion and thickness on the perception of facial profile attractiveness among subjects with different ethnic backgrounds. Materials and Methods: 424 participants were divided into four groups (European, Black African, Far Eastern, and Middle Eastern) and further subdivided into two subgroups according to age (18 to 40 and 41 to 60 years). An idealized female profile silhouette image was manipulated to generate 18 images with three different lip thicknesses and six sagittal lip positions. To assess perception of facial profile attractiveness, participants completed the developed questionnaire. Results: Statistically significant differences were found among subjects with different ethnic backgrounds for all images (P < .01). Percent agreement averaged 13.89%. Within each group, scores varied with lip thickness and protrusion, with significant interaction between the two factors. Gender and age had a significant impact on profile attractiveness mean scores. Conclusions: Ricketts norms for the most favorable lip position to E-line need to be updated. Middle Eastern and Europeans regarded lips positioned + 1 mm to the norm in relation to E-line as the most attractive. Thick lips that were mildly protruded were preferred by Africans. Far Eastern participants preferred normal thickness and thin lips that were protrusive; thick lips were ranked lowest. Among the thick lips, protrusive lips were ranked higher. More personalized and culturally sensitive orthodontic treatment planning is needed to help patients achieve their desired facial esthetic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.