ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2026
Recommendations for Standardization of Tobacco Use Treatment Data.
Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smoking in Patients With Cancer: Guidance for Delivering Effective Tobacco Treatment in Cancer Care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough there is widespread acceptance of the importance of assessing and treating tobacco use in cancer care settings, there is much variation in the documentation and reporting of metrics relevant to tobacco treatment. The Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I), as part of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Moonshot, convened a Metrics Standardization Workgroup to develop a data dictionary and make recommendations for standardized quality measurement, program evaluation, and tobacco treatment program development.
methodsA multidisciplinary workgroup of 12 subject matter experts was convened to deliberate and standardize definitions for tobacco assessment and treatment utilization metrics. Decisions on which data elements to include were informed by clinical guidelines, literature reviews, and workgroup members' expertise. Consensus was reached when all members agreed that the proposed metric was clear, clinically relevant, and could be abstracted and reported.
resultsThe group considered metrics in the following categories: (1) patient identification, screening, and referral; (2) tobacco treatment process metrics; and (3) treatment outcomes. Furthermore, the group developed a tobacco screening, referral and engagement workflow, and a data library for the following terms: patient population, screening rate, tobacco use prevalence, referral rate, reach, unsuccessful reach attempts, enrollment, treatment engagement, and counseling dose. Outcome metrics (i.e., varied "quit rate" terms) were collated and defined.
conclusionsThe proposed standardized data definitions can be used to improve communication and measure effectiveness for tobacco use treatment, research, operational performance, policy, quality improvement, and guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.