ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025
Gut microbiota-derived proinflammatory biomarkers and risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective study among United States males and females.
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endotoxins and Metabolic Endotoxemia in Obesity and Associated Noncommunicable Diseases: A Focus on Sex Differences.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Unveiling the gut-liver axis: the behind-the-scenes "manipulator" of human immune function.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a potent proinflammatory glycolipid derived from gut microbiota, may be linked to the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, evidence from human studies is limited.
objectivesWe aimed to investigate prospective relationships between 2 plasma biomarkers of LPS exposures-LPS-binding protein (LBP) and soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14)-in relation to incident CHD among United States males and females.
methodsA prospective nested 1:1 matched case-control study of CHD was conducted among participants in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). Plasma concentrations of LBP and sCD14 were measured in 496 HPFS male CHD case-control pairs and 212 NHSII female pairs.
resultsAmong controls, plasma concentrations of LBP exhibited positive correlations with age, body mass index, and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and an inverse correlation with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. For sCD14, positive correlations with age and CRP were only observed in HPFS controls. Neither elevated LBP nor sCD14 concentrations were significantly associated with incident CHD in HPFS. In NHSII, higher sCD14 concentrations, but not LBP, were significantly associated with higher risk of CHD, with a risk ratio of 3.01 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28, 7.11] when comparing extreme quintiles. Collectively, CRP and the total cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio explained 27.9% (95% CI: 7.1%, 66.1%; P = 0.01) of the positive association between sCD14 and CHD in NHSII females. These associations were not modified by physical activity, alcohol intake, body mass index, inflammation markers, family history of CHD, or the presence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or type-2 diabetes.
conclusionHigher concentrations of sCD14 may be associated with an increased risk of CHD in females, whereas LBP concentrations are not associated with CHD in either sex. These data do not support that LPS exposure in initially healthy individuals is a contributing CHD risk factor, although the potential sex difference should be explored further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.