ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Visual circuitry for distance estimation in Drosophila.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predation via motion parallax in one of two gleaning insects.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals must infer the three-dimensional structure of their environment from two-dimensional retinal images. They use visual cues like motion parallax and binocular disparity to judge distances to objects, and studies across several animal models have found and characterized neural signals that correlate with visual distance. However, the causal role of these neurons in distance estimation and the range of their possible neural properties remain poorly understood. Here, we show that both directional and non-directional feature-selective neurons in the Drosophila visual system are involved in estimating distance during free locomotion. We used a high-throughput behavioral assay to perform a targeted silencing screen of visual neurons, and we subsequently characterized distance tuning using in vivo two-photon microscopy, thus linking distance perception directly to neural signals. Silencing the primary motion detectors eliminated distance-dependent behavior, consistent with reliance on motion parallax. Our screen also identified a visual feature-detecting neuron that encodes a non-canonical motion parallax signal: the signal is not direction selective for object or background motion, but it is tuned to the relative speeds of foreground and background, resulting in a signal that can measure relative distance. Our results demonstrate the behavioral roles of direction-selective and distance-tuned neurons in fly distance estimation and provide a framework for considering broader classes of neurons that encode distance through motion parallax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.