SynthesisEBioMedicine2025
Artificial intelligence for tracking social behaviours and supporting an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-supported therapeutic interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for autism spectrum disorder: advances in diagnosis, behavior analysis and educational support.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- ERK-dependent hyperexcitability of BLA neurons projecting to dCA3 underlies social dysfunction in a male mouse model of fragile X syndrome.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge Structure and Evolution of Hotspots in Play Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis via Multiple Visualization Tools.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence, autism care, and health equity: a public health narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- AI-supported early autism identification as public health infrastructure: economic implications for the United States using a scenario-based economic model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for developing tools that can track social behaviours and support clinical assessments and outcomes in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This review evaluated existing AI algorithms for extracting facial information during social interaction assessments and contributing to diagnostic accuracy for ASD assessment and response to therapy.
methodsSystematic review of studies on human participants with an ASD diagnosis, sourced from Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms in ASD classification and their use in tracking social development through facial information for clinical application in social interactions. Bivariate and multi-level models addressed dependencies, heterogeneity, moderators (modalities, algorithms, tasks), and applied robust variance estimation. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots. The QUADAS-2 tool assessed the risk of bias and applicability. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249905).
findingsOf 40,570 studies identified, 38 met the review criteria, and seven provided sufficient data for meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 15.917 (95% CI [4.775-53.059]), and bivariate analysis estimated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.862. Accuracy improved with facial features, unstructured play, support vector machines, and decision tree-based algorithms. AI methods can analyse social behaviours, including eye gaze on social stimuli, emotional expression, and joint attention in ASD assessments. AI-enabled robots have also been used to guide therapy.
interpretationThis study shows that AI can accurately and objectively augment ASD assessments, track social behaviours, and enhance therapy outcomes. Further validation in diverse populations is needed to ensure clinical applicability and ethical use.
fundingNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.