ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2025
High-order mesoscale modeling with geometrically conforming gray/white matter interface for traumatic brain injury.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveBrain injury models with a supramillimeter resolution are not feasible to provide spatially detailed strains at or below millimeter scales, especially in regions of convoluted geometry such as at the gray/white matter interface. Furthermore, non-conforming mesh boundaries resulting from discretization errors can lead to inaccurate strain and stress distributions near interfaces, areas typically associated with elevated vulnerabilities in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Conventional approaches using extremely small linear elements are not effective to address the issue because of challenges in generating boundary-conforming meshes and slow convergence.
methodsIn this study, we adapt the Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) and isogeometric analysis (IGA) to develop high-order mesoscale models that smoothly represent complex tissue boundaries with highly resolved strain distributions. We address key challenges for applications to the brain, including the construction of smooth tissue boundaries from voxelized image segmentation and overcoming numerical difficulties arising from near-incompressibility.
resultsCompared to the conventional model using linear elements, the high-order mesoscale model demonstrates superior efficiency by achieving the same accuracy but with two orders of magnitude fewer degrees of freedom and at least one order of magnitude reduction in computational cost. Two-dimensional mesoscale models are constructed at gray/white matter interface to simulate realistic impact loading. The high-order mesoscale models discover strain concentration at the convoluted tissue boundary missing from the global model (e.g., up to 20% difference in magnitude). Notable differences in strain distribution also exist, with a normalized root mean squared error of up to 7.7% for strains sampled near the interface. These strain differences have major implications on downstream axonal injury model simulations.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the unique potential of leveraging IGA to develop mesoscale brain models with conforming tissue boundaries, and is important for filling a critical gap between global and cellular brain injury models in a multiscale modeling framework. The technique is general and scalable as it is applicable to diverse two- and three-dimensional biomechanical problems, including and beyond brain biomechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.