ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Multiscale simulation of respiratory airflow using physiologically consistent geometry and boundary conditions in OpenFOAM.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CFD Modeling of Airflow and Aerosol Transport in the Human Respiratory System: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In computed tomography (CT)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the human respiratory system, no or few studies have incorporated both realistic upper and lower airways, along with extensions to CT-unresolved higher-generation airways. In this study, we present a CT-based, physiologically consistent CFD model of the human airway that integrates artificial airway extensions down to the transitional bronchioles within the OpenFOAM framework. The model includes a hybrid turbulence approach combining Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES), and a state-of-the-art airway mesh smooth learning (AMSL) technique for constructing accurate airway geometries. Physiologically consistent boundary conditions are applied using airflow data derived from one-dimensional network simulations. We investigate the impact of the hybrid RANS-LES model on airflow characteristics, pressure distribution, and particle deposition by comparing it with conventional turbulence models, including the wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity (WALE) model for LES and the k-ω SST model for RANS. The AMSL method is also evaluated against the traditional Taubin smoothing technique. Our results show that pressure does not monotonically decrease throughout the upper respiratory tract but exhibits a continual decrease in the lower tract, independent of airway generation. The hybrid RANS-LES model demonstrates flow patterns and particle deposition characteristics comparable to those of the LES model and proves an improved fidelity over traditional RANS models. Furthermore, the AMSL technique significantly influences airflow behavior and particle deposition, highlighting the importance of accurate geometry processing. In conclusion, the proposed physiologically consistent CFD model, implemented in the OpenFOAM framework, demonstrates strong potential for clinical and research applications by offering enhanced accuracy and reliability. The use of an integrated airway model, extending from the upper airways to artificially constructed distal airways, facilitates a better understanding of multiscale airflow dynamics in the lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.