ArticleEthics & human research
Research Participant Bill of Rights: Clarifying the Role of Research Physicians.
Article in Ethics & human research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Subtle Crisis: Public Domain Genomes and the Ethics of Translational Infrastructure.Ethics & human researchArticle
- Research Participant Bill of Rights: Clarifying the Role of Research Physicians.Ethics & human researchArticle
- Digital Twins in Translational Research and Health Care: An Anthropological Perspective.Ethics & human researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians engaged in clinical research have dual roles as members of the research team and as physicians. Although various medical ethics codes and associated ethics opinions state that physicians have substantially similar obligations to research participants as they have to patients, the reality is different. Research physicians follow study protocols that often require practices that depart from the standard of care. The proposed Bill of Rights for Clinical Research Participants incorporates key ethics principles from the physician-patient relationship, some of which already are reflected in provisions of the ethics codes and opinions addressing nontraditional physician relationships. The Bill of Rights is intended to promote greater transparency and accountability in a frequently misunderstood relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.