SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Surgical proficiency of trainee surgeons on robotic platforms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the CorPath GRX robotic system in cerebral aneurysm embolization and diagnostic angiography: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Motor learning with force feedback instruments among laparoscopic surgeons and residents.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Applications of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Surgical Robotics: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mapping the scientific landscape of robotic hernia repair: a bibliometric and topic modeling analysis of thematic transitions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has transformed minimally invasive procedures by enhancing precision, dexterity, and visualization. However, it presents unique psychomotor and cognitive challenges that traditional surgical training often fails to address. Simulation-based platforms such as the da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS) and SimNow are widely implemented, yet a universally accepted standard for assessing robotic surgical proficiency remains elusive. Commonly used evaluation tools-GEARS, OSATS, and expert assessments-vary in standardization and applicability. To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize current evidence on simulation-based robotic surgical training in trainees, focusing on proficiency assessment tools, learning curve thresholds, and skill transfer from conventional surgical techniques. A systematic search of five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed up to June 2025. Eligible studies included trainee populations assessed using validated robotic simulators or evaluation metrics. Data extraction followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Fourteen studies including 652 surgical trainees met the inclusion criteria. Simulation-based training significantly improved performance on GEARS (SMD 1.22, 95% CI 0.96-1.49) and OSATS (SMD 1.08, 95% CI 0.82-1.34). Task completion times (SMD -0.95) and error rates (SMD-1.03) also improved markedly. Learning curve analyses revealed performance plateaus between 15 and 35 sessions (median: 22). Subgroup analyses showed comparable efficacy between dVSS and SimNow simulators. Skill transfer from laparoscopic surgery showed a moderate effect (SMD ~ 0.40), while no significant benefit was observed from open surgical experience. The integration of expert-defined proficiency thresholds and real-time feedback accelerated skill acquisition and improved self-efficacy scores. Simulation-based training significantly enhances robotic surgical proficiency, especially when integrated with validated metrics and expert feedback. A competency-based framework incorporating performance analytics and learning curve insights is essential for effective training. Future research should prioritize AI-enhanced, personalized training platforms and long-term validation of simulator-acquired skills in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41014455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.