ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2026
Development of a Competency Framework for Medical Affairs Professionals in Australasia.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Embracing Digital as a Paradigm Shift in Medical Affairs.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMedical Affairs (MA) plays a critical role in bridging the gap between research, clinical practice and business strategy. With the rapid growth in this field, it is essential to have a competency framework to support individuals' professional development. A well-defined competency framework will not only empower MA professionals to excel and develop in their roles but also contribute to better patient outcomes and improved stakeholder engagement. This paper discusses the development of a competency framework for Medical Affairs professionals in Australasia.
methodsThe MA competency framework was developed using an iterative method by a team of MA professionals across Australia through a series of workshops and surveys over 2 years with the cooperation of the local MA community. The core development team debated and finessed the final framework over this time via meetings and discussions to arrive at the draft framework. This was pilot tested by a local pharmaceutical organisation and feedback informed some minor changes to the final framework. This was then endorsed by the Medical Affairs of Australasia (MAPA) Executive Committee.
resultsThe framework consists of six domains: Scientific/Technical Knowledge, Evidence Generation, Compliance, Governance and Ethics, Leadership/Professionalism, Communication and Collaboration and Business Acumen, each with specific competencies and across four clearly defined levels from novice to expert.
conclusionThis framework has been endorsed by the Medical Affairs Professionals of Australasia Executive Committee and provides a clear framework for the professional development of medical affairs professionals across our region. It is also applicable to MA professionals more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.