ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Ellipsoid zone reflectivity changes after idiopathic epiretinal membrane peeling: a pilot study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis pilot study aimed to evaluate changes in ellipsoid zone (EZ) reflectivity and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) following epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling surgery in patients with stage 2 and 3 ERM.
methodsThirty-five patients with stage 2 and 3 ERM underwent surgical intervention. Preoperative and three-month postoperative measurements of BCVA and EZ reflectivity were taken using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The correlation between changes in BCVA and EZ reflectivity was analyzed.
resultsBCVA significantly improved from baseline (0.67 ± 0.23 LogMAR) to three months post-surgery (0.20 ± 0.20 LogMAR) (p < 0.0001). EZ reflectivity also showed a significant increase from baseline (0.62 ± 0.18) to the follow-up visit (0.99 ± 0.30) (p < 0.0001). A significant negative correlation was observed between BCVA (logMAR) and EZ reflectivity (r = - 0.758, p = 0.001).
conclusionsThis pilot study provides preliminary evidence that EZ reflectivity correlates with visual recovery after ERM peeling surgery and suggests potential utility as a biomarker for assessing photoreceptor health. Despite the small sample size, the significant correlation between improved BCVA and increased EZ reflectivity warrants further investigation in larger, longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41014401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.