Observational studyNeurosurgical review2025
Minimally invasive evacuation for spontaneous supratentorial haemorrhage: scoping for candidates and hypothetical logistic burdens in a pragmatic scenario.
Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is being evaluated as a promising treatment for spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). Transitioning to early clot removal requires accurate estimation of eligible candidates in practical scenarios. We conducted a prospective population-based observational study of ICH across all public stroke centres in Catalonia-Spain, between 2020 and 2022. Patient characteristics, need for conventional surgery and clinical outcomes were recorded. Inclusion and exclusion criteria from major trials assessing MIS for ICH were retrospectively applied to obtain the number of potential candidates. Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of withdrawal of care (WoC) decisions and variations in selection criteria on eligibility estimates. Among 2,197 reported ICH cases, 1,571 met the selection criteria and had complete follow-up to be analysed. Annually, 113 (14.4%) patients met the criteria for catheter plus thrombolysis evacuation (MISTIE-III criteria), and 45 (5.7%) for parafascicular evacuation (ENRICH criteria). Eligibility rates varied considerably depending on age and haematoma volume thresholds, and with changes in WoC, which affected 20-29% of potential candidates. Conventional evacuation was performed as a life-saving measure in 40 (5%) patients annually according to local protocols. If implemented, MIS protocols could increase the number of clot evacuation procedures in a range of 1.1-1.8 times. In a hypothetical scenario of MIS implementation for early ICH evacuation protocol in Catalonia, 5.7-14.4% of patients could potentially qualify for surgery. Consequently, the annual number of emergent clot evacuation procedures might increase 1.1-fold to 1.8-fold, highlighting substantial impact on healthcare infrastructure and resource planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41014383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.