Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41014367›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Effects of interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Björn Axel Johansson, Karin Wilbe Ramsay, Agneta Pettersson, Johan Bjureberg

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Björn Axel JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, and Region Skåne, Psychiatry, Habilitation & Aid, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Regional Inpatient Care, Malmö, Sweden.
Karin Wilbe RamsaySwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Agneta PetterssonSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan BjurebergDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden. Johan.Bjureberg@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2747-9990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-harm, including nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts, is common among youth, associated with elevated psychopathology, suicide risk, and increased demand for clinical services. Despite advances in understanding and treatment, few interventions have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which are considered the gold standard for evaluating treatment effects by randomly assigning participants to intervention or control groups. Building on prior meta-analyses, this study conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of interventions in adolescents across three outcomes: self-harm regardless of suicidal intent, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Systematic searches in PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline identified RCTs evaluating interventions for self-harm in youth under 18 years who engaged in self-harm at least once in the past six months. Studies were included if 80% met these criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modeling, primarily to account for heterogeneity across studies, as this approach accommodates variation in effect sizes that may arise from differences in for example study populations, and interventions. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Of 6497 screened records, 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that across three studies, Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) reduced the number of adolescents engaging in self-harm behaviors (risk difference [RD]=-0.12, 95% confidence interval: - 0.22 to - 0.02), with moderate certainty. Meta-analysis of two studies found Internet-delivered Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (IERITA) reduced both the episodes (mean difference =-4.65, - 8.04 to - 1.25) and occurrence of nonsuicidal self-injury at treatment end (RD=-0.20, - 0.34 to - 0.07), with low certainty of evidence. DBT-A appears effective in preventing repeated self-harm, supported by findings across multiple research groups. The less resource-intensive therapy IERITA may be beneficial for adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury. Larger sample sizes and consensus on definitions and measurement approaches will benefit future research and clinical practice.Prospero registration: ID CRD42023480178.

Indexed as

Dialectical Behavior TherapySelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentsMeta-analysisNonsuicidal self-injurySelf-harmSuicide attemptTreatment effects

Identifiers

PMID41014367
PMCPMC12916994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.