ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Quantifying 3D foot and ankle alignment using an AI-driven framework: a pilot study.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAccurate assessment of foot and ankle alignment through clinical measurements is essential for diagnosing deformities, treatment planning, and monitoring outcomes. The traditional 2D radiographs fail to fully represent the 3D complexity of the foot and ankle. In contrast, weight-bearing CT provides a 3D view of bone alignment under physiological loading. Nevertheless, manual landmark identification on WBCT remains time-intensive and prone to variability. This study presents a novel AI framework automating foot and ankle alignment assessment via deep learning landmark detection. MATERIALS AND
methodsBy training 3D U-Net models to predict 22 anatomical landmarks directly from weight-bearing CT images, using heatmap predictions, our approach eliminates the need for segmentation and iterative mesh registration methods. A small dataset of 74 orthopedic patients, including foot deformity cases such as pes cavus and planovalgus, was used to develop and evaluate the model in a clinically relevant population. The mean absolute error was assessed for each landmark and each angle using a fivefold cross-validation.
resultsMean absolute distance errors ranged from 1.00 mm for the proximal head center of the first phalanx to a maximum of 1.88 mm for the lowest point of the calcaneus. Automated clinical measurements derived from these landmarks achieved mean absolute errors between 0.91° for the hindfoot angle and a maximum of 2.90° for the Böhler angle.
conclusionThe heatmap-based AI approach enables automated foot and ankle alignment assessment from WBCT imaging, achieving accuracies comparable to the manual inter-rater variability reported in previous studies. This novel AI-driven method represents a potentially valuable approach for evaluating foot and ankle morphology. However, this exploratory study requires further evaluation with larger datasets to assess its real clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41014330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.