ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
Online decision aids for contraceptive choices in women with chronic conditions: A systematic review.
Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Awareness to Action: Bridging Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Contraceptive Counselling for Women with Chronic Medical Conditions-A Cross-Sectional Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen with chronic conditions face increased risks of unintended pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Tailored, online contraceptive decision aids might improve informed decision-making and support reproductive health by promoting patient-centered care in this population.
objectivesThis study systematically reviews the characteristics and effectiveness of online decision aids designed to support contraceptive and reproductive health choices in women with chronic conditions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care Database, and Emcare up until November 30, 2024, using terms related to contraception, decision aids, chronic conditions, and women's health. We also searched thesis repositories and reference lists of relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included studies evaluated web-based decision aids with a contraceptive choice component, targeted women of reproductive age (15-50 years) with chronic conditions, and assessed outcomes related to feasibility, user experience, knowledge, communication, or contraceptive uptake and behavior change. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, intervention features, and outcomes and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes. The GRADE approach was not applied to assess the quality of the included studies due to variability in study designs and outcomes. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473313). MAIN
resultsTen studies evaluating nine distinct decision aids met the inclusion criteria. Eight focused primarily on contraceptive choices, while two addressed broader reproductive health planning. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 8) and employed various designs: randomized controlled trials (n = 4), mixed-methods studies (n = 2), and descriptive studies (n = 3). The decision aids targeted various chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, cancer, rheumatic diseases, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease. The aids incorporated interactive features, personalized recommendations, and multimedia formats, with high user satisfaction and usability ratings reported. Some decision aids demonstrated improvements in contraceptive use, reproductive health knowledge, and communication. However, the effect on long-term contraceptive behaviors was mixed, with three studies showing positive but not statistically significant changes and one study reporting a negative correlation.
conclusionsOnline decision aids tailored for women with chronic conditions showed promise in improving user satisfaction, reproductive health knowledge, and patient-provider communication. However, their impact on long-term contraceptive behaviors remains inconclusive. Future studies should employ rigorous designs, validated outcome measures, and larger, more diverse populations to further evaluate the effectiveness of these aids and optimize their impact on contraceptive decision-making in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.