Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013993›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Unlocking grass leaf development: foundations for tunable cereal design.

Trisha McAllister, Hilde Nelissen, Josh Strable, Annis E Richardson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trisha McAllisterInstitute of Molecular Plant Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Kings Buildings Campus, Daniel Rutherford Building, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8819-1873
Hilde NelissenDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-1290
Josh StrableDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-8285
Annis E RichardsonInstitute of Molecular Plant Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Kings Buildings Campus, Daniel Rutherford Building, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-4902

Funding

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State UniversityUK Research and Innovation UKRI EP/Y010116/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The grass leaf plays a critical role in global food security, generating the carbon stores in cereal grains, which provide > 50% of global calories. As the global population grows, there is an urgent need to increase food production using fewer resources and to develop more resilient agricultural systems to withstand variable climate conditions and rising socio-economic and environmental costs. Precision engineering of cereal crops, tailored to diverse environmental conditions and agronomic practices, is a vital strategy for achieving food security. Given the fundamental importance of the leaf in driving cereal productivity, it is an ideal engineering target. Leaf development occurs over large temporal and spatial scales and is environmentally regulated, posing significant challenges for predictive engineering approaches and limiting the feasibility of a one-size-fits-all approach. In this review, we synthesise current understanding of cereal leaf development and identify critical developmental biology questions that must be resolved to facilitate the truly programmable plants of the future.

Indexed as

Edible GrainPlant LeavesPoaceaeCrops, Agriculturalcerealsdevelopmental biologygeneticsleaf developmentplant engineeringplant scienceprogrammable plants

Identifiers

PMID41013993
PMCPMC12529038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.