ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Slow-Oscillatory Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex Improves Motor Skill Acquisition.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amplitude-modulated kilohertz stimulation targeting beta-band activity disrupts motor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Slow-Oscillatory Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex Improves Motor Skill Acquisition.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Slow-oscillatory brain activity (< 4 Hz) is crucial in memory consolidation and motor performance. Although transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can modulate cortical oscillatory activity and influence motor learning, the effects of slow oscillation modulation via tACS remain unclear. This study investigated the effects of 0.75-Hz tACS applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) on the acquisition and retention of a visuomotor tracking task. Fifty-four right-handed healthy adults (mean age: 21.2 ± 0.6 years) were assigned to one of three groups: M1-tACS, Cz-tACS, or sham. In the M1-tACS and sham groups, electrodes were placed over the right M1 and left supraorbital ridge. In the Cz-tACS group, electrodes were placed over the Cz (International 10-20 system) and left supraorbital ridge to assess site specificity. tACS was administered for 30 min at 0.75 Hz and 1.0 mA, while participants practiced the visuomotor task. A retention test was conducted the following day. Motor learning was assessed using the power approximation index from the learning curve and error rates. The M1-tACS group showed a significantly lower approximation index than the sham group (p = 0.033), indicating enhanced learning. Error rates immediately after practice and on the following day were also significantly lower in the M1-tACS group (p = 0.039 and p = 0.007, respectively). No significant differences were found in the Cz-tACS group. These results suggest that slow-oscillatory tACS targeting the M1 facilitates motor skill acquisition and retention, with effects specific to the hand area of M1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.