ArticleBiomarker research2025
Epigenetic signatures on plasma cell-free DNA to detect kidney allograft rejection in a non-invasive way: development of a 10-plex digital PCR assay.
Article in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical evidence for supra-clinical acute kidney injury: current biomarkers are not enough.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard of care for the follow-up of kidney allograft recipients combines non-invasive but non-specific biomarkers and kidney biopsies for the gold standard histology-based diagnosis, limited by the sampling bias, haemorrhagic risk, and low cost-effectiveness. We hypothesized that a targeted epigenetic analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) would combine non-invasiveness and specificity for the diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection. We developed an in silico pipeline to identify 9 specific methylation signatures of epithelial or endothelial cell types in glomerular and tubular kidney compartments. Methylation-specific digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) were designed and validated for these markers and combined in a 10-plex dPCR. In a retrospective cohort of 170 plasma cfDNA from adult kidney transplant recipients, we evaluated the diagnostic properties of our biomarkers for predicting rejection, evaluated on solid biopsy according to Banff 2022 classification. Combining the dedicated biomarkers with standard-of-care blood tests (donor-specific antibody (DSA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) produced a prediction model with an Area under the Curve (AUC) for biopsy-proven kidney transplant rejection vs. no rejection greater than with DSA and eGFR alone (AUC = of 0.884 vs. 0.776, p = 0.0005). In an alternative model for the prediction of any graft lesion of Banff classification vs. pristine biopsies (all Banff score = 0) epigenetic kidney biomarkers outperformed DSA (AUC = 0.754 vs. 0.596, p = 0.004). Thus, epigenetic signatures derived from the combination of kidney cell type specific methylation marker of cfDNA constitute a promising non-invasive diagnostic and theragnostic tool for kidney transplant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.