Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013855›Full record

ArticleBiomarker research2025

Epigenetic signatures on plasma cell-free DNA to detect kidney allograft rejection in a non-invasive way: development of a 10-plex digital PCR assay.

Yoan Velut, Geoffroy Poulet, Thomas Bersez, Pauline Boyer, Coraline Maujean, Stéphanie Gnanalingam, Camille Moniot, Jana Heneine, Dany Anglicheau, Marion Rabant and 10 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yoan VelutCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Geoffroy PouletCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Thomas BersezCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Pauline BoyerCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Coraline MaujeanCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Stéphanie GnanalingamCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Camille MoniotCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Jana HeneineCGenetix, Company, Head office, 7 rue de Laborde, Paris, 75008, France.
Dany AnglicheauDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, and Université Paris Cité, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM U1151, CNRS UMR8253, Paris, France.
Marion RabantUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U1151, Institut Necker-Enfants Malades Pathology department, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Renaud SnanoudjKremlin-Bicêtre, AP-HP, Villejuif, France.
Vincent VuibletCHU REIMS, Reims, France.
Gabriel ChoukrounCHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
Tristan de NattesUniv Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, CHU Rouen, CIC-CRB 1404, Nephrology Department, Rouen, F-76000, France.
François AudenetDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Bastien ParierKremlin-Bicêtre, AP-HP, Villejuif, France.
Sophie FerlicotKremlin-Bicêtre, AP-HP, Villejuif, France.
Virginie VerkarreHEGP AP-HP, Paris, France.
David BuobTenon AP-HP, Paris, France.
Pierre GalichonSorbonne Université, INSERM UMR_S1155 CoRaKID Unit, AP-HP, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. pierre.galichon@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard of care for the follow-up of kidney allograft recipients combines non-invasive but non-specific biomarkers and kidney biopsies for the gold standard histology-based diagnosis, limited by the sampling bias, haemorrhagic risk, and low cost-effectiveness. We hypothesized that a targeted epigenetic analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) would combine non-invasiveness and specificity for the diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection. We developed an in silico pipeline to identify 9 specific methylation signatures of epithelial or endothelial cell types in glomerular and tubular kidney compartments. Methylation-specific digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) were designed and validated for these markers and combined in a 10-plex dPCR. In a retrospective cohort of 170 plasma cfDNA from adult kidney transplant recipients, we evaluated the diagnostic properties of our biomarkers for predicting rejection, evaluated on solid biopsy according to Banff 2022 classification. Combining the dedicated biomarkers with standard-of-care blood tests (donor-specific antibody (DSA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) produced a prediction model with an Area under the Curve (AUC) for biopsy-proven kidney transplant rejection vs. no rejection greater than with DSA and eGFR alone (AUC = of 0.884 vs. 0.776, p = 0.0005). In an alternative model for the prediction of any graft lesion of Banff classification vs. pristine biopsies (all Banff score = 0) epigenetic kidney biomarkers outperformed DSA (AUC = 0.754 vs. 0.596, p = 0.004). Thus, epigenetic signatures derived from the combination of kidney cell type specific methylation marker of cfDNA constitute a promising non-invasive diagnostic and theragnostic tool for kidney transplant patients.

Indexed as

Cell-free DNAdigital-PCREpigeneticKidney allograftRejection

Identifiers

PMID41013855
PMCPMC12465476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.