ArticleBMC psychology2025
The effects of encoding levels on the item and source memory of fearful and disgusting stimuli.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA number of studies have shown that fear and disgust, both highly negative and arousing emotions, have better memory performance compared with neutral emotions. However, previous studies found that fear and disgust had significant differences in memory performance. Although one study has examined the effect of encoding level on item memory for fear- and disgust-related words, it remains unclear whether encoding level similarly affects item memory for fearful and disgusting images, as well as source memory for emotional images. This study examined the effects of encoding level (deep vs. shallow) and emotion type (fear, disgust and neutral) on item and source memory in three experiments.
methodEach experiment included three phases: encoding, distraction, and retrieval. In Experiment 1, 44 participants (24 in the deep encoding group, 20 in the shallow encoding group) were asked to complete the incidental encoding and retrieval of item and extrinsic source. In Experiment 2, 56 participants (29 in the deep encoding group, 27 in the shallow encoding group) were asked to complete the same task as in Experiment 1 in intentional encoding. In Experiment 3, 57 participants (27 in the deep encoding group, 30 in the shallow encoding group) were asked to complete the intentional encoding and retrieval of item and intrinsic source.
resultsOur results showed that for item memory, the emotional memory advantage, especially for fearful stimuli, was observed in the shallow encoding. For source memory, no emotional memory advantage was observed in the shallow or deep encoding conditions in Experiment 1. However, in Experiments 2 and 3, fearful stimuli enhanced both frame and color source memory compared to disgusting and neutral stimuli in the shallow encoding conditions. Notably, in Experiment 3, disgusting stimuli impaired color source memory in the deep encoding conditions.
conclusionsOur results suggested that fear and disgust differed in terms of item and source memory performance. However, these differences were moderated by key boundary conditions, including the level of encoding and the cognitive resource demands associated with the emotional specificity of the stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.