SynthesisPrenatal diagnosis2025
Prenatal Evaluation of Scrotal Masses: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prenatal Evaluation of Scrotal Masses: A Systematic Literature Review.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of fetal genitalia is often neglected after determining fetal sex, yet the identification of a scrotal mass may suggest significant underlying conditions requiring specific management. We conducted a systematic literature review, following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024559035), on the five most common causes of prenatal scrotal masses: inguinoscrotal hernia (IH), meconium periorchitis (MPO), testicular solid tumors (TST), hydrocele (H), and testicular torsion (TT). A total of 83 cases were included (IH = 31; MPO = 23; TST = 6; H = 10; TT = 13), all diagnosed in the third trimester. IH typically presented as unilateral right-sided masses (63%), while MPO and H were predominantly bilateral (72% and 100%). TST and TT were mainly unilateral with no side preference. IH and MPO showed larger average diameters (> 35 mm). Additional findings were often associated with IH and MPO. MPO had the highest rates of preterm delivery (48%), neonatal medical support (40%), and urgent surgery (60.86%). IH and TST were usually associated with term deliveries and scheduled surgery (92.31% and 100%). TT showed a high incidence of urgent surgery (61.54%). This review outlines key sonographic features of prenatal scrotal masses to guide differential diagnosis and optimize perinatal care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.