Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013835›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2025

Learning in the moment: simulated patients' engagement in students' meaningful learning during communication training-a stimulated recall study.

Annelies Lovink, Marleen Groenier, Anneke van der Niet, Jan-Joost Rethans, Walther van Mook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annelies LovinkDepartment of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, Enschede, 75522 NH, the Netherlands. a.g.lovink@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-1466
Marleen GroenierDepartment of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, Enschede, 75522 NH, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7298-8431
Anneke van der NietDepartment IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-8636
Jan-Joost RethansSkillslab, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-3014
Walther van MookDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, MUMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2398-8878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have focused on the role of simulated patient (SP) feedback on students' learning outcomes after an SP-student encounter, whereas more recent studies have aimed to unravel meaningful learning during the encounter. We gain a more detailed understanding of students' meaningful learning by examining the perspectives of students and SPs during the SP-student encounter. The research question was as follows: What are characteristics of meaningful learning moments for students during SP-student encounters and what are the perceptions of SPs during these moments?

methodsTwelve second-year Technical Medicine students conducted a medical consultation with SP presenting the same patient case. Each consultation was followed by qualitative, video-stimulated recall (SR) sessions, first with the student and then with the SP. During these sessions, students were prompted to articulate the thoughts they had during the consultation to identify meaningful learning moments. Video-fragments of the meaningful learning moments identified by the student were subsequently shown to the SP to explore their perceptions. All verbatim-transcribed recall data were thematically analyzed.

resultsStudent-identified meaningful learning moments were characterized by experiences that offered new insights, evoked emotions, and/or involved feedback-in-action from the SP. The SP's perspectives of the same moments were compared to those of the students, revealing that these perspectives aligned approximately as often as they differed. SP experienced the moments as if they were the actual patient, fully embodying the patient's role, while simultaneously maintaining an overview and being aware of the student's learning position.

conclusionsThis stimulated recall study enhanced our understanding of students' learning during SP-student encounters. For students, meaningful learning moments involved new insights, emotional responses, and feedback-in-action from the SP. When SP fully engage in their patient role while maintaining awareness of the student's learning context, they can respond authentically and supportively. Preparing SP to balance authentic role portrayal with educational awareness can enhance their contribution to students' learning.

Indexed as

Medical communicationSimulated patients (SPs)Stimulated recallStudent learning

Identifiers

PMID41013835
PMCPMC12465989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.