ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Radiomics-based machine learning model integrating preoperative vertebral computed tomography and clinical features to predict cage subsidence after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile anchored spacer.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study of quantum-inspired PSO and EA with their binary variants for heart disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The design and biomechanical study of the 3D-printed implanted cervical vertebral cage.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop machine-learning model that combines pre-operative vertebral-body CT radiomics with clinical data to predict cage subsidence after single-level ACDF with Zero-P.
methodsWe retrospectively review 253 patients (2016-2023). Subsidence is defined as ≥ 3 mm loss of fused-segment height at final follow-up. Patients are split 8:2 into a training set (n = 202; 39 subsidence) and an independent test set (n = 51; 14 subsidence). Vertebral bodies adjacent to the target level are segmented on pre-operative CT, and high-throughput radiomic features are extracted with PyRadiomics. Features are z-score-normalized, then reduced by variance, correlation and LASSO. Age, vertebral Hounsfield units (HU) and T1-slope entered a clinical model. Eight classifiers are tuned by cross-validation; performance is assessed by AUC and related metrics, with thresholds optimized on the training cohort.
resultsSubsidence patients are older, lower HU and higher T1-slope (all P < 0.05). LASSO retained 11 radiomic features. In the independent test set, the clinical model had limited discrimination (AUC 0.595). The radiomics model improved performance (AUC 0.775; sensitivity 100%; specificity 60%). The combined model is best (AUC 0.813; sensitivity 80%; specificity 80%) and surpassed both single-source models (P < 0.05).
conclusionA pre-operative model integrating CT-based radiomic signatures with key clinical variables predicts cage subsidence after ACDF with good accuracy. This tool may facilitate individualized risk stratification and guide strategies-such as endplate protection, implant choice and bone-quality optimization-to mitigate subsidence risk. Multicentre prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.