ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Contribution of flow state to the discrepancy between perceived exercise intensity and physiological intensity during endurance bike exercise.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe flow phenomenon, achieving a heightened state of concentration, is characterized by an autotelic experience, which may reduce the perception of physical exertion during sports activities. It has been extensively documented in sports and is associated with exceptional performance. However, despite comprehensive descriptions of the autotelic experience in flow, the physiological mechanisms underlying flow remain elusive, limiting its reproducibility and broader application. This study aimed to elucidate the contribution of flow to the discrepancies between perceived exercise intensity and physiological intensity during endurance exercise using an exercise bike.
methodsWe assessed specific conditions conducive to flow during endurance exercise on a bicycle ergometer. Flow states were evaluated using a shortened version of the Flow State Scale, whereas subjective perceptions of exercise intensity were measured using the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Physiological responses were monitored by measuring heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption, breathing frequency, ventilation, and oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin levels for changes in cerebral oxygenation at the prefrontal cortex assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy.
resultsParticipants were categorized into RPE alleviation and escalation groups to examine individual differences in perceived exertion. RPE changes significantly differed between the two groups (p = 0.0002), despite no significant difference in HR changes (p = 0.36). The discrepancy ratios between perceived and physiological exercise intensity also significantly differed between groups (p = 0.001) and were negatively correlated with flow state levels (r = - 0.56).
conclusionsThese findings advance our understanding of the physiological and neurological correlates of flow states during physical activity, with potential applications extending beyond sports performance enhancement to domains such as education and arts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.