Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013742›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Mental health state in activists during political turmoil.

Konstantine Chakhunashvili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Konstantine ChakhunashviliCaucasus School of Medicine, Caucasus University, Tbilisi, Georgia. kchakhunashvili@cu.edu.ge.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-9479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health issues, including anxiety and depression, are widespread globally, with various stressors influencing their prevalence. While activism can be empowering, it may also contribute to mental health challenges. This study assesses the mental health of activists in the Republic of Georgia before a major political election, a period marked by significant political tension. We explore the relationship between personal factors (e.g., income, time spent on activism) and mental health outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween October 19 and October 25, 2024, we collected data from 73 activists (30 males, 43 females), assessing anxiety and depression using the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 tools. Participants were over 18 years old, without diagnosed psychiatric disorders, and actively involved in anti-government activism.

resultsNearly 80% of participants exhibited moderate to severe anxiety and depression levels. No statistically significant correlations were found between anxiety and depression scores and personal factors such as income, education, time spent on activism, or relationship status.

conclusionThis study reveals high levels of anxiety and depression among political activists in Georgia, likely exacerbated by political unrest. Although personal factors did not show significant correlations with mental health outcomes, ongoing political turmoil and government tactics may contribute to these challenges. Further research is needed to explore additional risk factors and develop targeted mental health interventions for activists.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionMental HealthPolitical ActivismPoliticsAdultFemaleGeorgia (Republic)HumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultActivismMental healthPolitical turmoil

Identifiers

PMID41013742
PMCPMC12465690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.