ArticleBMC psychology2025
Integrating digital tools and constructivist learning: a ubiquitous learning framework for enhancing creativity in music education.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of integrating digital tools with constructivist learning to enhance creativity in music education, a field where traditional pedagogies often fall short in meeting modern learners' needs. The research aims to develop and validate a ubiquitous learning framework grounded in constructivist principles, focusing on fostering creativity and music arrangement skills among Thai high school students. Utilizing a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods design, the study involved 200 students, divided equally into experimental and control groups, from 10 schools across five provinces in Northeast Thailand. The framework, comprising six key components - Problem Base, Learning Resources, Cognitive Tools, Collaboration, Scaffolding, and Coaching - was iteratively developed and refined through expert validation (CVI = 0.94). Quantitative analysis revealed significant improvements in creativity dimensions, particularly in flexibility (t = 13.02, p < 0.001) and elaboration (t = 10.76, p < 0.001), with scaffolding and cognitive tools emerging as key predictors. This study contributes a validated framework that bridges the gap between traditional and technology-enhanced music education, offering scalable applications in diverse learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.