ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
The impact of central line-specific dwell-times for neonatal central line associated bloodstream infections.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are among the most serious infectious complications associated with central lines in neonates. CLABSIs can be prevented by healthcare workers using "bundles" when inserting and managing central lines. These include prompt removal of the central line when it is no longer needed. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze neonatal CLABSIs, focusing on a minimal data set including specific catheter types and dwell times.
methodsA retrospective descriptive study reviewing the management and outcome of neonates with CLABSI admitted to the Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care at the Children's Hospital of Central Switzerland in Lucerne from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2023.
resultsIn this four-year period, a total of 27,636 neonates were born in the catchment area and 2599 neonates (9.4%) were admitted to our hospital. In total, 615 neonates (23.7%) had at least one central line with a total of 4940 catheter days. We observed an overall neonatal CLABSI rate of 2.9 per 1,000 catheter days. The rate varied significantly by catheter type: 0 per 1,000 catheter days for umbilical artery catheters (UACs), 0.9 per 1,000 catheter days for peripherally inserted central lines (PICCs), 5.6 per 1,000 catheter days for umbilical venous catheters (UVCs), and 17.9 per 1,000 catheter days for centrally inserted venous catheters (CVCs). All episodes of CLABSI were observed after a dwell time of 5 days, with increasing rates after 9 days.
conclusionsWe observed a pronounced variation in CLABSI rates between different catheter types. All episodes of CLABSI were observed after a dwell time of 5 days, with increasing rates after 9 days, and the rate of CLABSI increased with longer dwell times for UVCs and CVCs. This suggests a reduction in dwell time as a potential strategy for future quality improvement programs aiming for a zero CLABSI rate and underlines the importance of reporting central-line specific dwell-times for future publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.