Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013708›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

A scoping review protocol for the application of intersectionality in primary care research.

Sean Urwin, Harriet Bullen, Saad Abbas, Pulkit Singh, Stephanie Gillibrand, Georgia Chatzi, Philip Britteon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean UrwinHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. sean.urwin@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-8368
Harriet BullenHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Saad AbbasHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Pulkit SinghHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stephanie GillibrandHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Georgia ChatziCathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, Department of Social Statistics, School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Philip BritteonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

NIHR School for Primary Care Research 645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPast attempts to reduce inequalities in primary care have been met with mixed success. For initiatives to reduce inequalities, it is essential that they identify the most vulnerable groups in society to prevent any future exacerbation of inequalities. Intersectionality theory provides a framework to identify these groups via the exploration of how structural forms of social marginalisation interact to generate unique forms of inequalities. Despite this, little is known about the application of intersectionality theory in primary care research. To address this limitation, we propose a scoping review to comprehensively identify applications of intersectionality in the primary care inequalities literature.

methodsThe scoping review will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework. The review will search for studies using data to investigate intersectionalities in primary care context, using: (i) multiple electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ECONLIT, PsycArticles, Social Policy and Practice, and Scopus); (ii) OpenGrey to search the grey literature; and (iii) a forward and backward citation search. All authors will independently screen studies. DISCUSSION: The proposed review will be the first to identify studies that have utilised intersectionality theory and methodologies in a primary care context. The findings will inform the design and evaluation of future primary care inequality interventions. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/h9p83/.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesPrimary Health CareHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41013708
PMCPMC12465520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.