ArticleSystematic reviews2025
A scoping review protocol for the application of intersectionality in primary care research.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPast attempts to reduce inequalities in primary care have been met with mixed success. For initiatives to reduce inequalities, it is essential that they identify the most vulnerable groups in society to prevent any future exacerbation of inequalities. Intersectionality theory provides a framework to identify these groups via the exploration of how structural forms of social marginalisation interact to generate unique forms of inequalities. Despite this, little is known about the application of intersectionality theory in primary care research. To address this limitation, we propose a scoping review to comprehensively identify applications of intersectionality in the primary care inequalities literature.
methodsThe scoping review will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework. The review will search for studies using data to investigate intersectionalities in primary care context, using: (i) multiple electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ECONLIT, PsycArticles, Social Policy and Practice, and Scopus); (ii) OpenGrey to search the grey literature; and (iii) a forward and backward citation search. All authors will independently screen studies. DISCUSSION: The proposed review will be the first to identify studies that have utilised intersectionality theory and methodologies in a primary care context. The findings will inform the design and evaluation of future primary care inequality interventions. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/h9p83/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.