ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Self-harm and suicide in prisons in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review of prevalence and risk factors.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is a leading cause of death in prisons, and documented rates of self-harm (an established risk factor for suicide) are disproportionately higher in prisons than in the general population. However, research to date has focused largely on high-income countries, and as patterns of suicide and self-harm vary across cultures, there is an urgent need for research examining these phenomena in prisons in low- and middle-income countries. This review will synthesize findings from the published literature regarding the prevalence of, and risk factors for, suicide and self-harm among incarcerated persons in prisons in low- and middle-income countries.
methodsWe will search six electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS), and Global Index Medicus) for studies published in any language from database inception until 1 March 2024 reporting the prevalence and/or risk factors for self-harm and/or suicide in prisons in low- and middle-income countries (as defined by the World Bank). Grey literature will be identified by searching Google, Proquest, the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), and websites such as CADTH's Grey Matters. We will not restrict eligibility by age, gender, sentence type, or sentence duration. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NoS) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for prevalence and qualitative studies. Data addressing prevalence and incidence will be synthesized in narrative and graphic format. If sufficient data addressing risk factors for suicide and self-harm are identified, they will be meta-analyzed using the pooled adjusted odds ratio (with 95% confidence intervals). Sensitivity analysis will be conducted as appropriate. Meta-biases such as publication and outcome reporting bias will be assessed. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to assess the certainty of evidence collected in this systematic review. DISCUSSION: Findings from this review will contribute to strengthening our understanding of self-harm and suicide in carceral settings in low- and middle-income countries and may be used to inform prevention efforts. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Our systematic review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022382012).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.