Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013684›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Evaluating the use of body mass index change as a proxy for anorexia nervosa recovery: a machine learning perspective.

Tianfei Yu, Haolan Zhang, Yunhan Zhang, Ming Li

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianfei YuCollege of Life Science and Agriculture Forestry, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, 161006, China. yutianfei2001@163.com.
Haolan ZhangCollege of Life Science and Agriculture Forestry, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, 161006, China.
Yunhan ZhangCollege of Life Science and Agriculture Forestry, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, 161006, China.
Ming LiCollege of Computer and Control Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, 161006, China.

Funding

Heilongjiang Province Higher Education Teaching Reform Project SJGYY2024238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper critically examines the study by Brizzi et al., which applied explainable machine learning to predict short-term treatment outcomes in patients hospitalized for anorexia nervosa (AN). While the study presents an innovative and promising methodological framework, important conceptual and practical issues warrant further scrutiny. Chief among these is the reliance on body mass index (BMI) change as the sole proxy for treatment efficacy. This unidimensional metric, though pragmatic in acute inpatient settings, fails to capture the broader psychological and behavioral dimensions integral to AN recovery. The paper also interrogates the clinical applicability of machine learning tools, emphasizing both their potential to illuminate complex predictive patterns and the challenges they pose in terms of data sufficiency, interpretability, and real-world integration. Moreover, the identification of body uneasiness, interpersonal difficulties, and personal alienation as key predictive factors aligns with established theoretical models of AN, reinforcing the need for targeted psychotherapeutic interventions. However, further research is needed to explore how such predictors interact with specific treatment modalities and influence long-term outcomes. Overall, this paper underscores the value of integrating psychological variables into predictive modeling while cautioning against reductive interpretations of recovery in complex psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Anorexia nervosaBody image disturbanceExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Machine learningTreatment outcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID41013684
PMCPMC12476044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.