ReviewMicrobial cell factories2025
Bacteria-based immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment reprogramming: a promising dawn in cancer therapy.
Review in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does acute inflammation triggered by infection promote cancer progression?PLoS biology · 2026Review
- Postbiotics Against Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review Bridging Preclinical Evidence with Potential Clinical Application.Cancers · 2026Review
- Bacterial-based cancer therapy: mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Microbial Influence on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: The Gut-Lung-Immune Axis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Targeting Intratumoral Bacteria for Enhanced Tumor Suppression with Nano-Based Therapeutics: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Microbiome and cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic potential, and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Nanomedicines Reshape the Tumor Microenvironment: Multidimensional Strategies from Modulating "Barriers" to Metabolic Intervention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional chemotherapy, a prevalent cancer treatment modality, is associated with significant side effects and often leads to treatment failure. Non-specific drug distribution and chemoresistance are the main factors contributing to this failure. Certain distinctive characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (TME), including hypoxia, acidic pH, and increased interstitial fluid pressure, render cancer cells resistant to conventional treatments. Multiple approaches have been devised to enhance the treatment efficiency of neoplasms and overcome chemoresistance. Nowadays, bacteria-based cancer therapy has garnered significant interest in both preclinical and clinical research, owing to its distinctive mechanism and various applications in eliciting host antitumor immunity. Due to their inherent tumor tropism, elevated motility, and capacity for quick colonization in the conducive TME, bacteria are increasingly being considered for targeted tumor treatment. Bacteria, rich in pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), can efficiently stimulate immune cells even inside the immunosuppressive TME, boosting the particular immune detection and eradication of tumor cells. Furthermore, outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), cytoplasmic membrane vesicles (CMVs), and their derived physiological components exhibit analogous functionalities to their parental cells. This review article is representative of the latest innovations in bacteria-based immunosuppressive TME reprogramming. Additionally, the article discusses future directions in this research area, drawing on current advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.