ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
The role of environmental impact assessments in hospital care: Healthcare professionals' views on research and implementation priorities.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe crossing of planetary boundaries, such as climate change and biosphere integrity, threatens human health, while healthcare systems paradoxically contribute substantially to these environmental challenges. Although research on the environmental impact of care activities and pathways is expanding, it remains unclear how this information is used in clinical practice. This study explores healthcare professionals' views on the environmental impact of hospital care, the role of environmental impact data and research and implementation priorities to support sustainability in clinical practice.
methodsSemi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted between April and July 2024 with 31 Dutch healthcare professionals working across 12 medical (hospital) specialities with the highest care volumes and expenditures. Participants were selected on the basis of their involvement or interest in green healthcare initiatives. Focus groups and interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsParticipants have a general sense of environmentally impactful care activities, including surgical procedures, medication and outpatient visits. However, they reported a lack of quantitative environmental impact data at the clinical level, limiting their ability to make informed, sustainable choices. While participants recognized multiple uses for environmental impact data and supported integrating sustainability considerations into healthcare decision-making, they emphasized the need to balance these factors with other priorities, such as clinical effectiveness, patient safety and costs. Several research gaps were identified, including the need for comparative pathway analyses and standardized metrics. Additionally, implementation priorities, such as focusing on high-volume care, leveraging healthcare co-benefits and driving systemic changes to overcome barriers in the sustainability transition, were defined.
conclusionsHealthcare professionals lack the quantitative data needed for sustainable healthcare decision-making. Targeted research and implementation efforts should focus on high-impact, modifiable care. These findings may support better alignment between environmental research and clinical priorities, thereby informing evidence-based sustainability efforts in hospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.