ArticleBMC oral health2025
Awareness of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) use and radiation safety among dentists and specialists.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used in dentistry; however, many practitioners have limited knowledge regarding its appropriate indications and radiation safety protocols. Optimizing CBCT use is essential for both patient safety and diagnostic efficacy. This study aimes to evaluate Turkish dentists' and dental specialists' awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding CBCT usage, radioprotection, and dose-reduction measures.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to February 2024, involving 306 volunteer dentists with 1 to 51 years of clinical experience. Participants completed an 18-item questionnaire covering CBCT usage frequency, imaging indications, technical parameter selection, radiation protection and training. Statistical analysis included Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
resultsImplant planning, lesion evaluation, and root morphology assessment were the most common reasons for CBCT use. Oral and maxillofacial radiologists used CBCT more frequently than other specialists. A significant relationship was observed between frequency of CBCT use and the selection of technical parameters (voxel size, field of view) (p < 0.001). While lead apron usage was common, thyroid collar usage varied and showed a significant relationship with scan frequency (p = 0.001). Most participants relied on automatic settings and did not consistently consult a radiologist either before or after imaging.
conclusionsThe study reveals knowledge gaps in CBCT usage and radiation protection practices among dental professionals. Ongoing professional education and clearer guidelines are essential to ensure safe and effective use of CBCT technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.