ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025
An embodied perspective on adherence to preventive health measures: examples from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany studies have used ideas from phenomenological philosophy to explore health and health care, yet topics related to public health have often been overlooked. We argue that at least one crucial issue in public health—the question of adherence (or lack thereof) to preventive health measures—can benefit from a phenomenological perspective. While numerous studies have examined the factors influencing adherence, none have addressed the role that embodiment plays in shaping adherence. Building on existing phenomenological research on adherence, we demonstrate that phenomenology can offer a novel, embodied perspective on this issue.
methodsThis article draws on data from our phenomenologically grounded empirical study on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, which involved 16 in-depth interviews with individuals reluctant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. However, the aim of this article is not to present the specific findings about vaccine hesitancy. Instead, referring to both theoretical research within phenomenological tradition and interview data, we seek to generate new insights into the motivational orientation toward preventive health measures more broadly.
resultsWe demonstrate that adherence to a preventive measure depends on the type of bodily objectification involved—whether it is good or bad objectification. Good objectification involves a focus on one’s body that is compatible with one’s subjectivity, whereas bad objectification involves a focus on one’s body that disrupts subjectivity. We conclude that from an embodied perspective, nonadherence is grounded in a person’s wish to avoid the disruption of her subjectivity.
conclusionsBy recognizing the role that our embodied being in-the-world plays in our willingness or unwillingness to comply with preventive measures, this study offers a deeper understanding of the embodied motivation behind adherence and provides insights for both developing strategies to enhance adherence to preventive health measures and new directions for future phenomenological research in relation to public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.