ReviewGut pathogens2025
Comprehensive evaluation and progress of colorectal cancer screening methods.
Review in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term effectiveness of a two-step colorectal cancer screening strategy and risk of colorectal cancer after polypectomy.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Fecal Immunochemical Test and Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Real-World Practice: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolution of colorectal cancer (CRC) follows a progression from polyp to adenoma and eventually to cancer. The implementation of CRC screening is an effective strategy to interrupt the disease process and reduce morbidity and mortality during this process. Early diagnosis and treatment of tumors can be facilitated through widespread screening campaigns, thereby reducing the economic burden on the state, society and families. In order to achieve this goal, the key lies in the development of screening methods that are both efficient and economical to ensure that they can be widely disseminated and minimize the rate of missed diagnoses. At home and abroad, numerous scholars and experts have devoted themselves to the study of CRC screening methods. This review synthesizes current evidence through a systematic literature review to evaluate existing CRC screening methodologies, thereby offering critical insights to inform clinical decision-making in optimizing screening strategy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.