Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41013537›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Prevalence and risk factors of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent teeth in posterior dentitions: a retrospective study.

Xiaoyi Cui, Chunmiao Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Guike Zou, Ruifang Wang, Xiaolei Zhang, Yunyun Zuo, Chenguang Niu, Baojie He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaoyi Cui *The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Henan University School of Stomatology, Jinming Street, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China.
Chunmiao Zhang *The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Henan University School of Stomatology, Jinming Street, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China.
Yuanyuan LiHenan SATH Hospital of Stomatology, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, Dongming Road 177, 450000, China.
Guike ZouHenan SATH Hospital of Stomatology, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, Dongming Road 177, 450000, China.
Ruifang WangHenan SATH Hospital of Stomatology, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, Dongming Road 177, 450000, China.
Xiaolei ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Henan University School of Stomatology, Jinming Street, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China.
Yunyun ZuoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Henan University School of Stomatology, Jinming Street, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China.
Chenguang NiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Henan University School of Stomatology, Jinming Street, Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China. asdncg@henu.edu.cn.
Baojie HeHenan SATH Hospital of Stomatology, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, Dongming Road 177, 450000, China. hebaojie@sais.cn.

Funding

the Foundation for Young Scholar in Henan University School of Stomatology No. HUSSYS2024005the Foundation of Science & Technology Department of Henan Province, China No. 252102311099the Foundation of Science & Technology Department of Kaifeng, Henan Province, China No. 2203023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental implant therapy is widely used to restore dentition defects or loss, however, as a complication of it, interproximal contact loss (ICL) has not been adequately studied.

objectiveTo explore the prevalence of ICL between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent teeth, and to analyze the risk factors for ICL.

methodsTwo hundred and four participants who received 445 implant-supported prostheses from January 2011 to December 2020 were enrolled in the study. Aluminum strips of different thicknesses were used to determine the interspace between the implant-support prostheses and the adjacent teeth. Medical records of implant prostheses and participants were reviewed. Periodontal condition, occlusion, and additional factors were examined. Statistical analyses were performed to estimate the prevalence rate of ICL and its influential factors.

resultsThe prevalence of ICL was 59.8% at the patient level for 10-years function duration and increased over time. For the mesial site, the prevalence of ICL was 40.0% and food impaction (OR = 4.991, P < 0.001), adjacent teeth status (OR = 4.062, P = 0.042), function duration (OR = 1.299, P < 0.001) and bruxism (OR = 2.098, P = 0.034) were independent risk factors. For the distal site, the prevalence of ICL was 24.1% and food impaction (OR = 2.809, P = 0.002), mechanical complications (OR = 7.041, P < 0.001), bruxism (OR = 2.356, P = 0.019) and peri-implantitis (OR = 2.385, P = 0.021) were independent risk factors for ICL.

conclusionsICL was found to increase over time and was more common at the mesial site than at the distal site. Food impaction, function duration, adjacent teeth status, implant mechanical complications, bruxism and peri-implantitis were risk factors for ICL.

Indexed as

Dental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAdjacent teethClinical researchDental implantImplant complicationImplant prosthesesInterproximal contact loss

Identifiers

PMID41013537
PMCPMC12465378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.