ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Complication profile and risk patterns following elective implant removal in pediatric fractures: a 10-year retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding the optimal timing and necessity of implant removal (IR) following fracture healing in children. Although generally recommended between 1 and 12 months after osteosynthesis, IR carries risks such as refracture, infection, and neurovascular injury. This study aimed to evaluate the indications for IR, the timing of removal, and the complications observed during and after implant extraction in pediatric patients.
methodsThis retrospective study included 115 pediatric patients (mean age: 10.8 years, range: 2-17) who underwent IR following fracture treatment. Data on implant retention duration, type of implant, indication for removal, and post-removal complications were recorded and analyzed.
resultsIR was most commonly performed in asymptomatic cases upon parental request (90.4%), particularly for forearm fractures. Titanium elastic nails and plate-screw systems were the most frequently removed implants. Post-removal complications included refracture (4.3%), infection (1.7%), incomplete removal (1.7%), radial nerve neuropraxia (0.9%), and wound problems (0.9%). Refractures occurred within 5 to 18 days postoperatively, with the forearm being the most frequently affected region (7.5% of forearm IR cases). No statistically significant association was found between implant type, retention duration, and the occurrence of refracture (p > 0.05). These findings underscore the importance of patient-specific planning and postoperative protective strategies, especially for forearm IR.
conclusionImplant removal in pediatric patients is generally safe; however, the risk of early refracture, especially in the forearm, highlights the need for short-term activity restrictions and splint immobilization post-removal. Surgeons should clearly communicate the risks and timing of IR with families during the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.