ArticleBMC nursing2025
Psychometric evaluation of the Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale: a translation and validation study among Chinese nursing students.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo translate the Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale and evaluate its reliability and validity among Chinese nursing students.
backgroundAs online education continues to expand rapidly, understanding student satisfaction is essential for improving educational quality. However, there is a notable lack of assessment tools specifically designed to evaluate the satisfaction of nursing students in online learning environments in China.
designA cross-sectional study design.
methodThe Chinese version of OESSS adopted Brislin's translation model and conducted expert consultations to validate the face validity and testing of the translation version. Reliability and validity were tested using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability.
resultsThe Chinese version of the 28-item scale demonstrated good psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors, accounting for 66.623% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent fit indices: CMIN/DF = 1.185, RMSEA = 0.025, NFI = 0.917, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.984, and CFI = 0.986. Reliability measures were also robust, with a total Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.918, McDonald's Omega of 0.910, and test-retest reliability of 0.916.
conclusionThe Chinese version of Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale (C-OESSS) exhibits strong psychometric properties and is well-suited for measuring online education satisfaction among nursing students in China. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.